Brazilian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Cherokee

Good
Fair
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,847,867 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.143% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 142.6 Cherokee.
Brazilian Integration in Cherokee Communities

Brazilian vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $37,203, a difference of 25.5%), median household income ($88,934 compared to $72,682, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $80,843, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $54,133, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $47,848, a difference of 13.6%).
Brazilian vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricBrazilianCherokee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.4%

Brazilian vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 32.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.7%).
Brazilian vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianCherokee
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
13.2%

Brazilian vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.93%).
Brazilian vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianCherokee
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Brazilian vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Brazilian vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Brazilian vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Brazilian vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianCherokee
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
36.7%

Brazilian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.0%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.0%).
Brazilian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
7.7%

Brazilian vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 51.5%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.8% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
Brazilian vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Brazilian vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 47.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.9%).
Brazilian vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%