Immigrants from Ecuador vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,402,272 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 51.0 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 21.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $47,848, a difference of 12.3%), and median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $34,742, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $54,133, a difference of 0.19%), median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $48,669, a difference of 3.7%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $88,209, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 34.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 31.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), poverty (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 29.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.0%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 208.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 82.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 21.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 47.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 71.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 77.4%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 69.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.8%).