Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Portugal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Portugal

Cherokee

Poor
Fair
2,067
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
271st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Portugal Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,164,534 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 9.7 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Portugal Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $80,843, a difference of 18.1%), median household income ($84,740 compared to $72,682, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $86,125, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $54,133, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $47,848, a difference of 13.1%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PortugalCherokee
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,412
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,984
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Average
$84,740
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Good
$47,304
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,182
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,788
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,105
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,512
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,203
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,924
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 37.0%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.7%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PortugalCherokee
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Average
13.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.4%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PortugalCherokee
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PortugalCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 15.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (45.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.060%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PortugalCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.2%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 51.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.3%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PortugalCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.4%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PortugalCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.3%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.7%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.9%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PortugalCherokee
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.9%