Immigrants from Lithuania vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,184,673 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $37,203, a difference of 38.1%), median family income ($118,053 compared to $88,209, a difference of 33.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $80,843, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $47,848, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $54,133, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 54.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 54.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.95%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.2%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 69.3%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 62.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 61.2%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 11.9%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.0%).