Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Cherokee

Poor
Fair
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,407,229 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 30.9%), median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $34,742, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $47,848, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $54,133, a difference of 2.3%), median male earnings ($51,642 compared to $48,669, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $86,125, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCherokee
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,709
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,665
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,722
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,642
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,910
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,714
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,448
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$92,208
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,394
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 31.4%), married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.32%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCherokee
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 33.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.7%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.24%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCherokee
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.1%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 232.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 98.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 24.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 54.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 83.7%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 80.9%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.1%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 107.7%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 73.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.4%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%