Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zaire
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zaire

Cherokee

Fair
Fair
3,349
SOCIAL INDEX
31.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
225th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Zaire Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,163,663 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Zaire communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zaire within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zaire corresponds to a decrease of 43.6 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Zaire Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 22.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,529 compared to $47,848, a difference of 5.1%), and per capita income ($38,848 compared to $37,203, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,325 compared to $41,252, a difference of 0.18%), householder income over 65 years ($54,512 compared to $54,133, a difference of 0.70%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,207 compared to $86,125, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZaireCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,848
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$89,285
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,801
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,325
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,070
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,017
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,529
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,045
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,207
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,512
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.1%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZaireCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.0%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZaireCherokee
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZaireCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.2%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.7%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.6%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (40.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 16.6%), currently married (42.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and family households (59.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZaireCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.0%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 52.0%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 37.6%).
Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZaireCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.8%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.3%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.59%).
Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZaireCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.1%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.3%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.0%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.8%), cognitive disability (19.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.9%).
Immigrants from Zaire vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZaireCherokee
Disability
Fair
11.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%