Mongolian vs Cherokee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Mongolian
Cherokee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Mongolians
Cherokee
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cherokee Integration in Mongolian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,538,776 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.157% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 157.0 Cherokee.
Mongolian vs Cherokee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $37,203, a difference of 32.2%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $88,209, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $86,125, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $47,848, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $54,133, a difference of 20.7%).
Income Metric | Mongolian | Cherokee |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,173 | Tragic $37,203 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,553 | Tragic $88,209 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,971 | Tragic $72,682 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,038 | Tragic $41,252 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,350 | Tragic $48,669 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,542 | Tragic $34,742 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,540 | Tragic $47,848 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,578 | Tragic $80,843 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,602 | Tragic $86,125 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,326 | Tragic $54,133 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Tragic 27.4% |
Mongolian vs Cherokee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 34.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 34.2%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.96%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | Mongolian | Cherokee |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 22.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Mongolian vs Cherokee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 44.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Mongolian | Cherokee |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Mongolian vs Cherokee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Mongolian | Cherokee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 61.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 79.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Mongolian vs Cherokee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 31.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.34%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.45%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.92%).
Family Structure Metric | Mongolian | Cherokee |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 36.7% |
Mongolian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 69.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Mongolian | Cherokee |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Mongolian vs Cherokee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 89.9%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 86.3%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.15%), 9th grade (95.0% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Mongolian | Cherokee |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Average 95.8% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Good 94.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 93.0% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.8% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 89.9% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.0% | Tragic 38.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Mongolian vs Cherokee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.6%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.1%).
Disability Metric | Mongolian | Cherokee |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 28.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |