Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from El Salvador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from El Salvador

Cherokee

Fair
Fair
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from El Salvador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,301,334 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.405. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to a decrease of 11.4 Cherokee.
Immigrants from El Salvador Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 20.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $47,848, a difference of 14.1%), and median household income ($81,213 compared to $72,682, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $48,669, a difference of 1.5%), median earnings ($42,413 compared to $41,252, a difference of 2.8%), and per capita income ($38,394 compared to $37,203, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,394
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,545
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,213
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,413
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,973
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,673
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,599
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,913
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,176
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,226
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 31.1%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.21%), female poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and poverty (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Excellent
12.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.1%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.1%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCherokee
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.1%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.3%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.68%), family households (67.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (44.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
67.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.3%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.1%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.6%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 123.0%), high school diploma (80.8% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 10th grade (86.8% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.34%), associate's degree (38.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.3%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.8%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.6%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.4%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.0%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.4%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 63.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.5%).
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from El SalvadorCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%