Pennsylvania German vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,108,937 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.625. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 33.5 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 12.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,956 compared to $86,125, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $47,848, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $34,742, a difference of 0.17%), per capita income ($37,842 compared to $37,203, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $54,133, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.3%), female poverty (13.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (20.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and single male poverty (15.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.3%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and family households (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.2%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and college, under 1 year (54.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.5%).