Immigrants from Central America vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,920,080 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.705. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.2%), median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $48,669, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $47,848, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $86,125, a difference of 0.19%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $80,843, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $54,133, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and single female poverty (24.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.1%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (68.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 107.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.4%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.62%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.9%).