Luxembourger vs Cherokee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Cherokee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Luxembourgers
Cherokee
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cherokee Integration in Luxembourger Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,154,496 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.139% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 138.8 Cherokee.
Luxembourger vs Cherokee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $37,203, a difference of 22.7%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $88,209, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $80,843, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $47,848, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $54,133, a difference of 12.6%).
Income Metric | Luxembourger | Cherokee |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,663 | Tragic $37,203 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,183 | Tragic $88,209 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,418 | Tragic $72,682 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,640 | Tragic $41,252 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,300 | Tragic $48,669 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,891 | Tragic $34,742 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,379 | Tragic $47,848 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,237 | Tragic $80,843 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,536 | Tragic $86,125 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,967 | Tragic $54,133 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 27.4% |
Luxembourger vs Cherokee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.6%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 46.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 14.8%).
Poverty Metric | Luxembourger | Cherokee |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 22.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 17.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 19.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Luxembourger vs Cherokee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Luxembourger | Cherokee |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.0% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Luxembourger vs Cherokee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Luxembourger | Cherokee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 61.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 45.3% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.0% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.4% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Luxembourger vs Cherokee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 24.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Luxembourger | Cherokee |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.3% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.4% | Tragic 36.7% |
Luxembourger vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Luxembourger | Cherokee |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.1% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.9% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Luxembourger vs Cherokee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 40.2%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Luxembourger | Cherokee |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.1% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 38.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Luxembourger vs Cherokee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 46.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.0%).
Disability Metric | Luxembourger | Cherokee |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 28.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.8% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |