Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Liberia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Liberia

Cherokee

Poor
Fair
1,533
SOCIAL INDEX
12.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
303rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Liberia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,741,512 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 8.6 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Liberia Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 33.4%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $34,742, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($42,923 compared to $41,252, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $80,843, a difference of 0.020%), householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $47,848, a difference of 0.28%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $54,133, a difference of 0.31%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LiberiaCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,165
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,450
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,896
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,923
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,317
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,970
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,981
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,863
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,739
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,967
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.4%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.76%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LiberiaCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.1%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LiberiaCherokee
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.8%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LiberiaCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.9%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.9%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 27.8%), married-couple households (40.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and currently married (41.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LiberiaCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.3%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.8%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.6%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 57.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 34.5%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LiberiaCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.3%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.1%), bachelor's degree (33.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (88.2% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and 11th grade (91.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LiberiaCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.3%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.5%).
Immigrants from Liberia vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LiberiaCherokee
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%