Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sri Lankans

Cherokee

Good
Fair
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,922,782 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Cherokee.
Sri Lankan Integration in Cherokee Communities

Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,093 compared to $72,682, a difference of 28.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,960 compared to $80,843, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $86,125, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.2%), median male earnings ($56,136 compared to $48,669, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $47,848, a difference of 15.9%).
Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricSri LankanCherokee
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,014
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,234
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,093
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,040
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,136
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,496
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,470
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,960
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,270
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,201
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 40.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.85%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.6%).
Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricSri LankanCherokee
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.7%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.4%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.2%

Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSri LankanCherokee
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSri LankanCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
79.0%

Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 26.7%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.82%), family households (67.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSri LankanCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.9%
Tragic
36.7%

Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSri LankanCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.5%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.0%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.7%

Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 75.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.5%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.17%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricSri LankanCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 51.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.4%).
Sri Lankan vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricSri LankanCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.5%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%