Immigrants from Oceania vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,434,894 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 56.9 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,100 compared to $72,682, a difference of 22.6%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $37,203, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $80,843, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $47,848, a difference of 12.2%), and median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $48,669, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 19.9%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.080%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.4%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.21%), high school diploma (88.8% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.4%).