Laotian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,651,886 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.138% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 137.8 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,990 compared to $72,682, a difference of 30.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $80,843, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $86,125, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $47,848, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $34,742, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 47.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 41.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 28.8%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.8%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 52.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.5%).