Osage vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,623,166 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.355% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 355.2 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $37,203, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $47,848, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $80,843, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $86,125, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $54,133, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 14.4%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.18%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.3%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.7%).