Slavic vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,314,739 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 48.1 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $37,203, a difference of 21.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $80,843, a difference of 19.2%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $88,209, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.090%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $47,848, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $54,133, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 30.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and single father poverty (17.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.7%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.1%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.3%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.8%).