Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 427,352,498 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Northern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.109% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Europe corresponds to an increase of 109.0 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,159 compared to $37,203, a difference of 45.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($111,676 compared to $80,843, a difference of 38.1%), and median family income ($121,840 compared to $88,209, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,571 compared to $47,848, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,003 compared to $54,133, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 46.6%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 44.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 88.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 77.0%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 71.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 53.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.8%).