Ottawa vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,826,122 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Ottawa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ottawa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ottawa corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,611 compared to $48,669, a difference of 4.4%), median female earnings ($33,378 compared to $34,742, a difference of 4.1%), and median earnings ($39,721 compared to $41,252, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,101 compared to $37,203, a difference of 0.27%), householder income under 25 years ($47,366 compared to $47,848, a difference of 1.0%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), poverty (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.33%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.4%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.56%), currently married (46.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.34%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.9%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and master's degree (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.8%).