Carpatho Rusyn vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Pima
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,065,397 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.997. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.409% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 1,409.4 Pima.
Carpatho Rusyn vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $30,644, a difference of 54.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,777 compared to $73,365, a difference of 40.1%), and median family income ($107,502 compared to $77,431, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($40,825 compared to $35,326, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $82,821, a difference of 20.1%).
Income Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,248 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,502 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,635 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,617 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,572 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,825 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,113 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,449 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,777 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,093 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 189.6%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 143.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 116.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 35.2%).
Poverty Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Pima |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.5% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 173.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 118.1%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 99.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.0% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 72.8% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 99.1%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 66.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.7%), family households (61.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.7% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.06 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.9% | Tragic 51.5% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.2%), no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 22.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.5% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 89.3%), bachelor's degree (42.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 81.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 71.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%).
Education Level Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.1% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.9% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.1% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 79.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.0%).
Disability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.8% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |