Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Puget Sound Salish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Puget Sound Salish

Pima

Average
Poor
5,672
SOCIAL INDEX
54.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
172nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Puget Sound Salish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,376,469 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to a decrease of 28.1 Pima.
Puget Sound Salish Integration in Pima Communities

Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,495 compared to $30,644, a difference of 35.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,340 compared to $73,365, a difference of 34.0%), and median household income ($84,011 compared to $63,262, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $51,503, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $35,326, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $82,821, a difference of 13.1%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Income
Income MetricPuget Sound SalishPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,495
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,958
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Fair
$84,011
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Average
$46,333
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,704
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,376
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,543
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,661
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,340
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,934
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Exceptional
21.1%

Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 133.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 122.1%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 118.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 44.6%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricPuget Sound SalishPima
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
19.0%

Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 154.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 152.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 127.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.8%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuget Sound SalishPima
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
11.7%

Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 11.0%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuget Sound SalishPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
72.8%

Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 69.1%), single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 55.4%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.51%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuget Sound SalishPima
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.4%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
51.5%

Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.4%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuget Sound SalishPima
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
7.9%

Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (40.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.1%), bachelor's degree (30.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 32.1%), and college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricPuget Sound SalishPima
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.9%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.9%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.7%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 42.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricPuget Sound SalishPima
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.97%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.8%