Central American Indian vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Central American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Central American Indians

Pima

Tragic
Poor
506
SOCIAL INDEX
2.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
344th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Central American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,204,657 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.259% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 259.5 Pima.
Central American Indian Integration in Pima Communities

Central American Indian vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $30,644, a difference of 23.0%), median household income ($74,847 compared to $63,262, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $73,365, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $82,821, a difference of 0.57%), median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $35,326, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $50,539, a difference of 5.3%).
Central American Indian vs Pima Income
Income MetricCentral American IndianPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,699
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,034
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,847
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,474
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,433
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,930
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,643
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,355
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,764
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,232
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
21.1%

Central American Indian vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (21.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 46.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 44.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.7%).
Central American Indian vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricCentral American IndianPima
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.5%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
19.0%

Central American Indian vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 111.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 91.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 13.2%).
Central American Indian vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCentral American IndianPima
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
11.7%

Central American Indian vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 5.3%).
Central American Indian vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCentral American IndianPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.1%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.7%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.4%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.5%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
72.8%

Central American Indian vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.6%), births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and married-couple households (43.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Central American Indian vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCentral American IndianPima
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.8%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.3%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.0%
Tragic
51.5%

Central American Indian vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
Central American Indian vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCentral American IndianPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.5%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.0%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.9%

Central American Indian vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (32.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 40.2%), associate's degree (40.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (88.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Central American Indian vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricCentral American IndianPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.7%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.2%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.5%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.0%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.5%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Central American Indian vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 42.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.68%), male disability (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Central American Indian vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricCentral American IndianPima
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.5%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%