Immigrants from Australia vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,851,519 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 44.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $30,644, a difference of 89.1%), median family income ($126,620 compared to $77,431, a difference of 63.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,308 compared to $73,365, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $51,503, a difference of 10.0%), median female earnings ($46,573 compared to $35,326, a difference of 31.8%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 33.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 160.3%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 142.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 113.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 41.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 164.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 128.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 126.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 111.2%), births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 93.4%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), family households (61.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.080%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 125.6%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 112.4%), and bachelor's degree (48.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 109.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 84.1%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 70.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.4%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.7%).