Czech vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,715,008 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 49.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $30,644, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $73,365, a difference of 41.1%), and wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.16%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $35,326, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $82,821, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 183.6%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 147.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 126.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 33.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 39.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 183.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 147.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 117.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 28.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.3%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 68.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 105.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 63.7%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 59.3%), and associate's degree (47.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 72.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.9%).