Immigrants from Western Asia vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,757,470 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,876 compared to $30,644, a difference of 53.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,217 compared to $73,365, a difference of 44.8%), and median household income ($90,005 compared to $63,262, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($41,375 compared to $35,326, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,516 compared to $82,821, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 97.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 97.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 91.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 8.6%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 39.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 143.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 116.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 107.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 102.7%), births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 89.1%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.75, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.7%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 88.8%), bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 82.1%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.30%), 7th grade (95.6% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and 6th grade (96.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 68.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.1%).