Yakama vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 5,598,630 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 43.6 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,992 compared to $73,365, a difference of 18.6%), median household income ($72,225 compared to $63,262, a difference of 14.2%), and wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($39,107 compared to $38,285, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.5%), and median female earnings ($33,354 compared to $35,326, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 43.5%), family poverty (13.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 40.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.0%), single female poverty (28.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 108.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 102.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 99.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 27.6%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 27.2%), and currently married (44.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.24%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 113.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 64.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 24.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 40.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 67.9%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and associate's degree (32.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (46.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability (13.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.8%).