Eastern European vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,489,024 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Eastern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.736. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Eastern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.306% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Eastern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 306.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,780 compared to $30,644, a difference of 82.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($120,684 compared to $73,365, a difference of 64.5%), and median family income ($125,546 compared to $77,431, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,066 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($45,385 compared to $35,326, a difference of 28.5%), and wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 35.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 177.8%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 153.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 120.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.6%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 41.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 42.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 171.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 133.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 118.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 113.4%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 85.6%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.2%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 128.3%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 114.4%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 113.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 87.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 69.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.1%).