Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Pima

Poor
Poor
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,291,409 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 46.8 Pima.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Pima Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,655 compared to $30,644, a difference of 35.9%), median household income ($80,402 compared to $63,262, a difference of 27.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $73,365, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,856 compared to $82,821, a difference of 8.5%), and wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 9.3%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
21.1%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 83.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 78.0%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.5%), receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.3%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianPima
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Tragic
19.0%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 111.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 107.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 89.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.7%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianPima
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
11.7%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
72.8%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 92.0%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and currently married (41.5% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.7%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianPima
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
51.5%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 84.9%), no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 68.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 13.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 61.8%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
7.9%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.2%), bachelor's degree (35.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 53.7%), and associate's degree (43.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.86%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 61.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 48.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.6%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianPima
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%