Fijian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,949,655 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.988. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 40.9 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $30,644, a difference of 19.7%), median household income ($74,205 compared to $63,262, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $73,365, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $35,326, a difference of 0.60%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $82,821, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 102.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 97.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 85.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.2%), single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 184.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 140.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 128.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 41.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 59.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.0%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.60%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 23.8%), associate's degree (37.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.5% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 43.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 39.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 5.2%).