Palestinian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,239,248 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Palestinian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Palestinians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Palestinians corresponds to an increase of 44.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,790 compared to $30,644, a difference of 49.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,721 compared to $73,365, a difference of 46.8%), and median household income ($90,574 compared to $63,262, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,515 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.020%), median female earnings ($41,484 compared to $35,326, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,777 compared to $82,821, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 134.5%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 120.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 109.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.5%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 42.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 51.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 172.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 124.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 108.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 93.9%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 81.1%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 69.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 76.3%), bachelor's degree (40.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 75.4%), and associate's degree (49.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Palestinian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 73.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%).