Egyptian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,251,527 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to an increase of 63.9 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,358 compared to $30,644, a difference of 57.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,256 compared to $73,365, a difference of 53.0%), and median household income ($95,673 compared to $63,262, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.7%), median female earnings ($43,305 compared to $35,326, a difference of 22.6%), and wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 135.3%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 125.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 112.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.75%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 43.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 53.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 164.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 122.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 116.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 102.0%), births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 82.3%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.82%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.75, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.6%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 90.3%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 86.4%), and associate's degree (50.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.060%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and 8th grade (95.8% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 79.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 72.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 66.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.0%).