Marshallese vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,905,554 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Marshallese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.989. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Marshallese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.345% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Marshallese corresponds to an increase of 344.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,874 compared to $50,539, a difference of 30.3%), per capita income ($39,108 compared to $30,644, a difference of 27.6%), and median household income ($78,930 compared to $63,262, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,575 compared to $82,821, a difference of 0.91%), householder income under 25 years ($50,627 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($36,459 compared to $35,326, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 122.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 118.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 94.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.5%), single mother poverty (32.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 127.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 109.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 99.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 71.6%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 48.1%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.3%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (41.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 37.5%), bachelor's degree (31.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 36.8%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and 8th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 52.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.68%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability (13.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.6%).