Lithuanian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,949,156 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.994% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 993.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $30,644, a difference of 61.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $73,365, a difference of 53.3%), and median family income ($115,395 compared to $77,431, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $35,326, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,223 compared to $82,821, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 188.1%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 155.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 125.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.1%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 52.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 166.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 131.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 100.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 97.9%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 74.2%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 67.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 91.8%), bachelor's degree (42.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 82.1%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 80.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.8%), male disability (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.8%).