Ghanaian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,095,672 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 24.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,164 compared to $30,644, a difference of 37.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $73,365, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($83,582 compared to $63,262, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $82,821, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 99.0%), family poverty (10.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 78.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.9%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 31.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 35.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 121.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 97.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 89.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 72.6%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 50.3%), and currently married (42.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.9%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 67.9%), bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 63.8%), and associate's degree (45.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 60.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.8%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.2%).