Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Pima

Exceptional
Poor
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,083,912 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.994. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.914% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 913.7 Pima.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $30,644, a difference of 67.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $73,365, a difference of 55.8%), and median household income ($96,836 compared to $63,262, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $51,503, a difference of 6.8%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $35,326, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $82,821, a difference of 30.6%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 164.1%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 154.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 127.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (25.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 53.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 63.1%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaPima
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 166.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 126.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 120.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.7%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaPima
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.3%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 121.4%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 85.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.1%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaPima
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.4%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaPima
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 99.9%), bachelor's degree (44.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 92.3%), and associate's degree (52.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaPima
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 87.9%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 73.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.8%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaPima
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%