Barbadian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,627,026 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,406 compared to $30,644, a difference of 38.4%), median household income ($79,664 compared to $63,262, a difference of 25.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $73,365, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $50,539, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,565 compared to $82,821, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 81.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 71.1%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.9%), single father poverty (17.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 117.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 105.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 83.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 93.3%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 39.3%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.75, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (62.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 101.4%), no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 84.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 16.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 75.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 58.9%), bachelor's degree (36.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 55.6%), and associate's degree (43.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.5% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 59.0%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.6%).