Menominee vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Menominee
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Menominee
Pima
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Menominee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,302,680 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to an increase of 37.5 Pima.
Menominee vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,578 compared to $30,644, a difference of 12.8%), median household income ($68,423 compared to $63,262, a difference of 8.2%), and wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($42,581 compared to $42,357, a difference of 0.53%), median earnings ($37,884 compared to $38,285, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,719 compared to $50,539, a difference of 2.3%).
Income Metric | Menominee | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,578 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $79,563 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,423 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $37,884 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,581 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,894 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,907 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $79,358 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $76,903 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,719 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.7% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Menominee vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 125.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 118.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 111.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (37.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.1%), single female poverty (27.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 10.3%).
Poverty Metric | Menominee | Pima |
Poverty | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.3% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 25.0% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 37.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Menominee vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 109.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 109.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Menominee | Pima |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 11.7% |
Menominee vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.7% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Menominee | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.6% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.3% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.7% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.7% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 72.8% |
Menominee vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (42.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 18.1%), currently married (42.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.75, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.70%), family households (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and single father households (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.93%).
Family Structure Metric | Menominee | Pima |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.0% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.30 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.3% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.1% | Tragic 51.5% |
Menominee vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 58.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Menominee | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Menominee vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (36.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 21.4%), bachelor's degree (27.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and ged/equivalency (86.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Menominee | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.0% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.6% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Menominee vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 116.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.7%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.56%), disability (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.80%).
Disability Metric | Menominee | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |