Uruguayan vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,728,755 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.999. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 54.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $30,644, a difference of 44.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $73,365, a difference of 34.5%), and median household income ($84,691 compared to $63,262, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $35,326, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $82,821, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 111.8%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 101.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.4%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 36.2%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 50.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 144.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 102.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 98.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.8%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 55.5%), and married-couple households (45.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.8%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 65.6%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 65.0%), and associate's degree (46.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 73.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 57.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.3%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.8%).