Laotian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,108,647 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 28.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $30,644, a difference of 53.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $73,365, a difference of 51.4%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $63,262, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $35,326, a difference of 19.3%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 142.1%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 126.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 107.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 43.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 157.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 138.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 126.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 87.2%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 80.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 84.0%), bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 80.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.23%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 72.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 66.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.5%).