Filipino vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,480,321 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($59,066 compared to $30,644, a difference of 92.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($134,910 compared to $73,365, a difference of 83.9%), and median household income ($115,509 compared to $63,262, a difference of 82.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $51,503, a difference of 12.1%), median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $35,326, a difference of 40.1%), and wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 40.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 182.5%), family poverty (6.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 176.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 167.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 49.6%), and single mother poverty (24.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 58.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 190.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 149.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 146.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 131.6%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 124.0%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 76.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.75, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Pima communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 160.5%), master's degree (23.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 153.1%), and professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 128.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (19.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 103.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 100.5%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 97.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.85%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 22.9%).