Thai vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Thai
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Thais
Pima
10,191
SOCIAL INDEX
99.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
2nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Thai Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,628,371 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Pima.
Thai vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,307 compared to $30,644, a difference of 77.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $73,365, a difference of 76.6%), and median household income ($110,648 compared to $63,262, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $51,503, a difference of 14.9%), median female earnings ($47,577 compared to $35,326, a difference of 34.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $50,539, a difference of 42.7%).
Income Metric | Thai | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,307 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $131,281 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $110,648 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $59,237 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $72,135 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $47,577 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $59,187 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $121,778 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $129,560 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $72,099 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Thai vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 191.0%), family poverty (6.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 174.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 154.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother poverty (24.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 57.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 67.3%).
Poverty Metric | Thai | Pima |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.3% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Thai vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 198.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 142.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 141.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Thai | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Thai vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Thai | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.2% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.9% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.0% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.3% | Tragic 72.8% |
Thai vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 117.1%), births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 114.3%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 58.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (30.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.75, a difference of 16.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Thai | Pima |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.6% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 51.9% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.9% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.0% | Tragic 51.5% |
Thai vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 72.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Thai | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.9% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Thai vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 134.8%), bachelor's degree (50.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 116.0%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 109.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Thai | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.5% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.1% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 73.4% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 68.6% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 57.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 50.1% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
Thai vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (20.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 92.3%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 91.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 88.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.11%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 23.0%).
Disability Metric | Thai | Pima |
Disability | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |