Bahamian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,729,756 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to a decrease of 20.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,427 compared to $30,644, a difference of 18.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,743 compared to $51,503, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,369 compared to $73,365, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $35,326, a difference of 0.57%), householder income over 65 years ($51,000 compared to $50,539, a difference of 0.91%), and median earnings ($39,735 compared to $38,285, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 72.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 57.1%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father poverty (18.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 128.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 84.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 67.2%), births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and currently married (41.2% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 54.9%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.94%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (32.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 40.2%), associate's degree (41.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 37.2%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.31%), 7th grade (95.7% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 58.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.3%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.7%).