Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Sudan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Sudan

Pima

Average
Poor
4,416
SOCIAL INDEX
41.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
199th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Sudan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,978,740 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Sudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sudan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sudan corresponds to a decrease of 8.8 Pima.
Immigrants from Sudan Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,986 compared to $30,644, a difference of 37.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,781 compared to $73,365, a difference of 27.8%), and median family income ($97,737 compared to $77,431, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,109 compared to $82,821, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($38,511 compared to $35,326, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,791 compared to $51,503, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from SudanPima
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,986
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,737
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$79,103
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,767
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,489
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,511
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,791
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,109
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,781
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,248
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 99.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 97.8%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 28.2%).
Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from SudanPima
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Average
12.7%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 162.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 132.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 113.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.1%).
Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from SudanPima
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 13.5%).
Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from SudanPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.0%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.8%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.8%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 55.0%), and currently married (43.5% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.56%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (60.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 9.6%).
Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from SudanPima
Family Households
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.9%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.2%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.6%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 25.6%).
Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from SudanPima
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 72.8%), bachelor's degree (39.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 69.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.13%), 7th grade (95.8% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.45%).
Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from SudanPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.2%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.4%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.4%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 62.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.0%).
Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from SudanPima
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%