Portuguese vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,171,099 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,362 compared to $30,644, a difference of 44.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $73,365, a difference of 43.5%), and median household income ($88,976 compared to $63,262, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.7%), median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $35,326, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $82,821, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 147.8%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 119.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 97.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.8%), single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and single female poverty (20.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 47.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 132.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 108.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 100.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 68.9%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 52.2%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 64.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.96%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 52.9%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 50.6%), and associate's degree (44.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 64.2%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 52.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.92%), male disability (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.0%).