Immigrants from Fiji vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,599,053 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 13.9 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Pima communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,933 compared to $63,262, a difference of 48.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $73,365, a difference of 45.8%), and per capita income ($42,694 compared to $30,644, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $51,503, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $35,326, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Pima communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 105.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 103.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 96.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (13.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.6%), single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 45.0%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 56.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 159.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 123.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 104.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 76.5%), single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.6%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.3%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.75, a difference of 8.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 80.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 65.8%), bachelor's degree (33.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 45.4%), and associate's degree (42.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.0% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.14%), 9th grade (92.3% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 54.6%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 53.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 10.4%).