Czechoslovakian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,401,888 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 225.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $30,644, a difference of 42.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $73,365, a difference of 38.2%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $63,262, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.55%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $35,326, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $82,821, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 162.2%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 129.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 119.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.6%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 42.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 158.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 130.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 107.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 79.8%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 60.7%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 80.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 59.5%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 56.9%), and associate's degree (46.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 67.8%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.4%).