Asian vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Asian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Asians

Pima

Excellent
Poor
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Asian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,599,015 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Pima.
Asian Integration in Pima Communities

Asian vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,057 compared to $30,644, a difference of 63.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $73,365, a difference of 61.4%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $63,262, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $51,503, a difference of 10.7%), median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $35,326, a difference of 26.2%), and wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 27.6%).
Asian vs Pima Income
Income MetricAsianPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,057
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,955
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$101,681
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,690
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,827
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,586
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,003
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$112,666
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$118,426
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,822
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
21.1%

Asian vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 144.8%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 137.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 121.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (26.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 48.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 56.2%).
Asian vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricAsianPima
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
19.0%

Asian vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 167.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 137.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 130.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.8%).
Asian vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAsianPima
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.4%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
11.7%

Asian vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.6%).
Asian vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAsianPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
72.8%

Asian vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 98.9%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 92.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.87%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.75, a difference of 14.2%).
Asian vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAsianPima
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.1%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.28
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.8%
Tragic
51.5%

Asian vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 57.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Asian vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAsianPima
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.0%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.9%

Asian vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 99.4%), bachelor's degree (44.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 91.3%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 84.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.39%), 9th grade (94.5% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and 6th grade (96.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.60%).
Asian vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricAsianPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.4%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.4%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.4%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.1%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.4%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Asian vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 80.6%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 75.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 18.9%).
Asian vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricAsianPima
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.9%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%