French Canadian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,682,801 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 9.6 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $30,644, a difference of 40.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $73,365, a difference of 35.1%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $35,326, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $82,821, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 168.4%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 125.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 25.2%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.7%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 143.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 122.9%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 94.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 27.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.0%), births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 49.6%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.29%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 80.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 53.5%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 52.3%), and associate's degree (44.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 77.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 62.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.1%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.5%).