Cheyenne vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,633,091 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.336% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to an increase of 335.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,276 compared to $30,644, a difference of 15.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,275 compared to $51,503, a difference of 13.8%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,673 compared to $35,326, a difference of 0.98%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $73,365, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,152 compared to $82,821, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 60.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 42.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (30.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.22%), single mother poverty (38.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 64.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.0%), births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and married-couple households (42.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.93%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Pima communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (38.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.9%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 26.9%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 42.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (31.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.14%), male disability (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.2%).