Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uruguay
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uruguay

Pima

Fair
Poor
3,806
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
209th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Uruguay Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,545,998 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 184.4 Pima.
Immigrants from Uruguay Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $30,644, a difference of 43.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $73,365, a difference of 31.0%), and median household income ($82,560 compared to $63,262, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $82,821, a difference of 10.1%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $35,326, a difference of 10.2%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UruguayPima
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,997
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$98,205
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,560
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,682
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,860
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,945
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Average
$52,302
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,171
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,086
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,975
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.6%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 99.7%), family poverty (9.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 92.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 84.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.5%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.8%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 47.2%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UruguayPima
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.2%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 142.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 104.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 98.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.1%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UruguayPima
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UruguayPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 72.0%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 51.8%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UruguayPima
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 28.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.4%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UruguayPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.1%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.4%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 62.7%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 61.9%), and associate's degree (45.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UruguayPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.1%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 70.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 56.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.6%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.2%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UruguayPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%